HISTORICIZING UGANDA’S REGIONAL MILITARY INTERVENTIONS: STRUCTURING A REGION OF WARFARE
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
HISTORICIZING UGANDA’S REGIONAL MILITARY INTERVENTIONS : STRUCTURING A REGION OF WARFARE. / Kaalund, Mathilde.
In: EAST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PEACE & HUMAN RIGHTS, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2023, p. 113-143.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - HISTORICIZING UGANDA’S REGIONAL MILITARY INTERVENTIONS
T2 - STRUCTURING A REGION OF WARFARE
AU - Kaalund, Mathilde
N1 - SPECIAL ISSUE ON MILITARIZATION, GOVERNANCE AND PEACE IN UGANDA: MULTIDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In the early twenty-first century, wars, armed conflicts and repression havecontinued to affect post-colonial Africa. So too, have militarized regionalpeacekeeping or peace enforcement responses. This article highlights therole of African state agency and seeks to answer two questions: what has beenthe role of the Uganda Peoples Defence Forces (UPDF) in regional orderingand relation to liberal peacekeeping over the past two decades? And whichideational and material forces have shaped the mode of regional UPDFintervention and hence their regional influence? It examines the historicityof the regional politics of intervention in Eastern Africa with a specific focuson Uganda. This adds both conceptual insights, as well as a deeperunderstanding of regional enduring patterns. The article finds thathistorically, Ugandan relations and modes of armed intervention can besituatedwithin the ‘Dar es Salaam School’ of thought, a specific anti-colonialmilitarist revolutionary formation inspired by Frantz Fanon, Walter Rodneyand Julius Nyerere. Three defining imperatives of regional intervention canbe explained to have dominated Uganda and other African state polities fordecades, viz., 1) Fear of balkanization and tribalization as a history of civilwars and fragmentation; 2) aspiration of national economic independencethrough the continental expansion of economic markets; and 3) regional(forced) unity, strategic essentialism (in Gayatri Spivak’s term) as a meansto counter global powers. These questions provide the foundation forconstructive critique of militarised peace interventions as warfare. Thearticle uses concrete Ugandan relationships between armed force and itsapplication in the theatres of war in Somalia, South Sudan and theDemocratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to illustrate the imperatives
AB - In the early twenty-first century, wars, armed conflicts and repression havecontinued to affect post-colonial Africa. So too, have militarized regionalpeacekeeping or peace enforcement responses. This article highlights therole of African state agency and seeks to answer two questions: what has beenthe role of the Uganda Peoples Defence Forces (UPDF) in regional orderingand relation to liberal peacekeeping over the past two decades? And whichideational and material forces have shaped the mode of regional UPDFintervention and hence their regional influence? It examines the historicityof the regional politics of intervention in Eastern Africa with a specific focuson Uganda. This adds both conceptual insights, as well as a deeperunderstanding of regional enduring patterns. The article finds thathistorically, Ugandan relations and modes of armed intervention can besituatedwithin the ‘Dar es Salaam School’ of thought, a specific anti-colonialmilitarist revolutionary formation inspired by Frantz Fanon, Walter Rodneyand Julius Nyerere. Three defining imperatives of regional intervention canbe explained to have dominated Uganda and other African state polities fordecades, viz., 1) Fear of balkanization and tribalization as a history of civilwars and fragmentation; 2) aspiration of national economic independencethrough the continental expansion of economic markets; and 3) regional(forced) unity, strategic essentialism (in Gayatri Spivak’s term) as a meansto counter global powers. These questions provide the foundation forconstructive critique of militarised peace interventions as warfare. Thearticle uses concrete Ugandan relationships between armed force and itsapplication in the theatres of war in Somalia, South Sudan and theDemocratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to illustrate the imperatives
M3 - Journal article
VL - 29
SP - 113
EP - 143
JO - EAST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PEACE & HUMAN RIGHTS
JF - EAST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PEACE & HUMAN RIGHTS
SN - 1021-8858
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 374456437